The creation of Vietnam
Idol, if anything, seems less like an attempt to integrate Vietnam into the
global ideas of what is popular and more of an imposition of Western ideals. A fine line distinguishes these two, seeing
that the things that are popular around the world do tend to originate from the
West, aided by their large presence in the world’s social, political, and
economical arena. I interpreted this
difference as letting Vietnam find its own way to incorporate aspects of global
culture in a way that works for them as opposed to the forcedness of Vietnam Idol. It’s apparent that the mannerisms and mindset
of Vietnamese people are not the same as their American or British
counterparts, who hail from places where Idol
is popular and functioning well. At the
introduction of Vietnam Idol, Vietnam
is already at a disadvantage because essentially, they are taking medicine that
the West prescribes and that they do not know works for their body. Evidently, Idol enforces the idea of the neoliberalism and the American Dream,
placing stress on individuality. While
this might make sense, given that Vietnam’s reorientation towards free trade
was mentioned at the beginning, thus invoking ideas of Western capitalist
economy and along with it, the concept of pulling oneself up by the bootstraps,
it must be remembered that poor, rural areas are still prevalent in
Vietnam. These areas are glossed over by
Vietnam Idol, which did not attempt
to cast for any participants around those parts; this acknowledges that the
adamant push Vietnam’s technoculture towards public engagement isn’t best
suited for Vietnam, since a big part of the public is still being
excluded. Furthermore, the juxtaposition
of Vietnam Idol and its more popular American Idol counterpart reiterates the
superiority that the West feels, because in terms of popularity and which
program is doing better, Vietnam always appears to be lagging behind.
No comments:
Post a Comment