In the reading, Mobile Cultures by
Sandip Roy, the topic of GLBT is discussed and how the movement was able to
gain influence through the internet. In this day in age, the internet holds a great
deal of power and influence. It allows people not only to be heard by millions,
but also allows them to do so in a way that protects the individual. In seconds,
people are able to connect all over the world to form a unifying voice or bring
attention to important topics. I think this is one of the easies places to be
used as an everyday form of resistance. There is no much potential to speak out
or oppose the hegemonic rules imposed by those who fail to grasp the state of
other groups within culture. Through the possibility to go anonymous, people
are protected from direct repercussions or rules of containment. On the other
hand, the internets are an inconsistent form of communication. There is a great
deal of room for misinterpretation and lack of unifying organization. As stated
in the article, there is a need for the physical unifying of people to create an
identity. It is too easy to state something anonymously and still feel disconnected.
The fact is that the internets is just too vast. People can state what they
want but due to the size it is not likely to grain much influence.
In the video Kelly Loves Tony, it
is interesting to see the contrast between the cultural history brought forth
by her mother and the independent decision of Kelly. While the mother wished to
keep tradition, Kelly does not want to follow a lot of their practices. To a degree,
it seems that Kelly does not want to follow in her mother’s footsteps and that
is why she does not want to follow their cultural practices. She wishes to gain
the opportunities within American and seems to associate some cultural aspects
to the lack of success in her mother.
No comments:
Post a Comment