The reading by Scott was interesting
because it introduced a different perspective for me. When Scott urged for
more, consistent smaller actions rather than collective or mass actions, I was initially
confused. On the surface, it makes more sense that the more individuals
fighting for a shared cause, the more that motive might succeed. After reading
Scott, I realize that that is exactly where the action starts: at the
individual level. Although I have to disagree with his dismissive attitude
about peasant rebellions, because in his time I believe that was probably the
only way for these lower status individuals to revolt and fight for their
rights. But to counter hegemonic powers that are orchestrated throughout class
systems, it makes more practical sense for smaller forms of rebellion to take
place in order to change a popular culture that has been engrained into society
for what one can assume has been a long time.
As for Kelley’s writing, I believe
it was very supplemental to Scott’s argument, and if anything it continues to
expand on it. His examples of resisting and struggling against these notions of
power was more relevant for me. This is because I have worked several part-time
jobs in which I have experienced similar occurrences as the ones Kelley writes
about from his job. Another reason I enjoyed this reading was because Kelley
took an applicable approach to better reach his audience when trying to explain
Scott’s theory. I believe that after reading this, I have a more comprehensive
understanding of what Scott was also trying to explain through what I think was
slightly more of a theoretical approach. Personally, I grasp definitions and
concepts much more easily through applying them to practical situations or
examples, so having read these pieces one after the other, I feel satisfied
walking away with a better understanding of hegemony.
No comments:
Post a Comment