“From Race Rebels” and “From Weapons of the
Weak”
In “From Race
Rebels”, D.G. Kelley speaks of his own experiences working as a McDonald’s employee
and how struggle is being depicted in his perspective. He describes of the
different stereotypes that people think of McDonald workers such as looking at
them as being stupid and probably most of them were from poor families (P.96), but
in fact there is more to the story. I found that this reading was very
meaningful because it seems like they are well aware of the situation that they
are being treated poorly in working conditions and being underpaid on top of
that worsen things. They know what situation they are in but they choose to go “against”
their “masters” in a more optimistic yet effective way. Rather than fighting
heads on with their employer and demanding for more pay these workers are
finding ways to make the best out of their situations such as fighting for
their own identities in the work place, with females having long beautiful
nails and cashiering, and then guys are able to dress a certain way. It was an
eye opener seeing that they are able to fight in a different way because they
know that if they go heads on to the employer that would get them fired. They worked
on building their own identities in America and at the same time it was fun for
them.
In “From Weapons
of the Weak”, James C. Scott spoke about peasantry and centered around
Malaysian peasants that were struggling to obtain better livings. The many ways
that peasants showed their resentments to the lowly paid jobs they would not
work as efficiently in order to show to their “masters” that they are not happy
with their current paying conditions. They would be called “everyday forms of
resistance” as self help (P.90) because they are simply wanting to survive in
this economy. The workers would put on “passive resistance” and that alone was
nearly unbeatable because “masters” need their workers in order to have work
carried out. I think that was a smart way to declare resentment because workers
are well aware that their hard work is needed and if there is no addition of
pay then people would rebel. They also realize that their resistance only goes
so far because ultimately they have no power. The most interesting I read was
about the “forest crimes” of how people would go so far as to crossing borders
and boundaries to obtain what they need in this case poachers wouldn’t care if
the rabbits they took or firewood they took came from a certain land or
employer (P.94). It makes sense and I thought it was relatable why peasants did
that for survival because it’s not fair that they are working so hard and being
underpaid.
No comments:
Post a Comment