BEYOND A BOUNDARY:
In cricket, James was taught to practice the British ideals
of fair play and perseverance. While in
today’s society, being a good sport is seen as an admirable trait, it
essentially seems to be an exercise in repressing what James calls “personal inclinations”. The code under which the cricket players
operate can thus be extended to the British’s control over the West Indies, in
which those being imperialistically ruled can be compared to personal
inclinations whereas the code represents the erasure of these personal
inclinations, or people. In other words,
the practice of this code is an example of how culture oppresses. By becoming self-aware of how easily he
consumes English practices, James begins his own form of protest against this
cultural oppression.
HIND SWARAJ:
Essentially, the use of European machinery and the
consumption of its products represent a kind of hegemony. In agreeing to continue to economically
support this method of making things, India is also agreeing to continue to be
dominated by British rule. Gandhi’s call
for India to forsake machinery and take up the loom again brings us back to Baudhillard’s
method of fighting hegemony, which was to withdraw the consent that fueled
hegemonic rule in the first place.
Furthermore, through Gandhi’s argument, we are able to see that
something as simple as the use of machines are multifaceted in that they wield
social, economic, and political power over those that consume it.
No comments:
Post a Comment